"Poe's law" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "^([sic])",
      "name": "sic"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Formulated in 2005 by a user named “Nathan Poe” on the website christianforums.com, originally in the context of creationism.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "Poe's Law",
      "tags": [
        "alternative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Poe's law",
      "name": "en-proper noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "name",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English adages ending in \"law\"",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Internet",
          "orig": "en:Internet",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              14,
              23
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2013, Scott F. Aikin, Robert B. Talisse, Why We Argue (And How We Should) […] , Routledge, →ISBN, page 130:",
          "text": "If you accept Poe's Law, you hold that religious believers are indistinguishable from their parodies.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              4,
              13
            ],
            [
              283,
              292
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2017 June 5, Emma Grey Ellis, “Can't Take a Joke? That's Just Poe's Law, 2017's Most Important Internet Phenomenon”, in WIRED, →ISSN, archived from the original on 13 Jul 2018:",
          "text": "But Poe's Law isn't only useful as a defense against pearl-clutching reactions. It's also a diagnosis of exactly how the troll mentality has weakened internet culture. […] But because the internet has changed in innumerable ways since 2005, expanding and accelerating all the while, Poe's Law applies to more and more internet interactions.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              129,
              138
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2018, Whitney Phillips, Ryan M. Milner, The Ambivalent Internet […] , John Wiley & Sons, →ISBN, page 121:",
          "text": "It's not just digital media tools that amplify the ambivalence of humor online. The familiar combination of context collapse and Poe's Law is equally impactive.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The observation that, on the Internet, without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is impossible to tell the difference between sincere extremism and a parody of extremism."
      ],
      "id": "en-Poe's_law-en-name-g8jQHenv",
      "links": [
        [
          "Internet",
          "Internet"
        ],
        [
          "indication",
          "indication"
        ],
        [
          "intent",
          "intent"
        ],
        [
          "impossible",
          "impossible"
        ],
        [
          "extremism",
          "extremism"
        ],
        [
          "parody",
          "parody"
        ]
      ],
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "context collapse"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "Poe's law"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "^([sic])",
      "name": "sic"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Formulated in 2005 by a user named “Nathan Poe” on the website christianforums.com, originally in the context of creationism.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "Poe's Law",
      "tags": [
        "alternative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Poe's law",
      "name": "en-proper noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "name",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "context collapse"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adages ending in \"law\"",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English eponyms",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English proper nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Internet"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              14,
              23
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2013, Scott F. Aikin, Robert B. Talisse, Why We Argue (And How We Should) […] , Routledge, →ISBN, page 130:",
          "text": "If you accept Poe's Law, you hold that religious believers are indistinguishable from their parodies.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              4,
              13
            ],
            [
              283,
              292
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2017 June 5, Emma Grey Ellis, “Can't Take a Joke? That's Just Poe's Law, 2017's Most Important Internet Phenomenon”, in WIRED, →ISSN, archived from the original on 13 Jul 2018:",
          "text": "But Poe's Law isn't only useful as a defense against pearl-clutching reactions. It's also a diagnosis of exactly how the troll mentality has weakened internet culture. […] But because the internet has changed in innumerable ways since 2005, expanding and accelerating all the while, Poe's Law applies to more and more internet interactions.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              129,
              138
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2018, Whitney Phillips, Ryan M. Milner, The Ambivalent Internet […] , John Wiley & Sons, →ISBN, page 121:",
          "text": "It's not just digital media tools that amplify the ambivalence of humor online. The familiar combination of context collapse and Poe's Law is equally impactive.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The observation that, on the Internet, without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is impossible to tell the difference between sincere extremism and a parody of extremism."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "Internet",
          "Internet"
        ],
        [
          "indication",
          "indication"
        ],
        [
          "intent",
          "intent"
        ],
        [
          "impossible",
          "impossible"
        ],
        [
          "extremism",
          "extremism"
        ],
        [
          "parody",
          "parody"
        ]
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "Poe's law"
}